Truck Speed Limiters Won’t Improve Highway Safety

Written by James C. Walker, executive director of the nonprofit National Motorists Association Foundation. This is one in a series of periodic guest columns by industry thought leaders.

Jim Walker headshot

Jim Walker

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants all heavy trucks to have speed limiters – devices that block big rigs from driving above a certain predetermined speed. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety – which is also pushing for lower speed limits – and other groups support NHTSA’s planned regulation.

While no one wants to see 80,000-pound tractor-trailers traveling at unsafe speeds, there’s plenty of evidence that shows why devices that keep trucks from accelerating above a certain level for what is likely to be a short distance isn’t a good idea.

Such a plan would increase the frequency of speed variance conflicts between big trucks and light-duty vehicles. Although multi-lane freeways safely deal with significant speed variances as long as the flow is not congested, conflicts increase when one truck is passing another with a speed differential of one-half mph, effectively blocking two lanes.

Drivers in states near Ontario, Canada, where many trucks are limited to 105 kph — or about 65 mph — have firsthand experience with congestion created by such a policy. Here’s what happens:  A truck in the right lane is traveling at 64 mph when a trailing rig decides to move to the left lane to pass.  But the trailing truck is limited to just 65 mph hour and can’t get the momentum needed to complete the maneuver quickly. This can create a rolling roadblock that takes a mile to resolve.

Once you get that type of congestion, bad behavior typical of frustrated light-duty vehicle drivers tailgating and lane bobbing proliferates in the backup. Speed limiters would spark a nationwide explosion in that type of driving.

The safety problem will be even worse on two-lane highways, particularly in states where light-duty vehicles can legally travel at speeds above whatever arbitrary top pace is selected for trucks. Multiple trucks will stack up in convoys running close together at the limit speed.  A three-truck convoy will be well over 200 feet long and a five-truck convoy could be more than 400 feet long. This will create extremely dangerous situations for light-duty vehicles attempting to use the oncoming lane for long distances to pass convoys of trucks that are packed together because their speed is electronically limited.

Limiters would have the effect of requiring differential speed limits for trucks in the many states that never had them, or which removed them after finding differential limits to be neutral or negative to safety.  Research sponsored by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety by Nicholas Garber of the University of Virginia found no safety value for differential speed limits for trucks..

Truck speed limiters would wrongfully re-impose federal control over speed limits that correctly belong to the individual states to suit their particular conditions.  Recent statements from some trucking groups seem to say they want to roll the clock back to 1987 to reinstate the hated and counterproductive 65 mph National maximum speed limit. There would be serious opposition to such a federal overreach.

The vast majority of goods we purchase travel in trucks. They account for 70 percent of all the freight tonnage moved in the U.S., according to the American Trucking Associations. That’s about 10 billion tons of freight. Requiring speed limiters will increase the costs of shipping in every state where the arbitrary limiter speed is below the current actual travel speeds for trucks.  The rule would also require more trucks on the road to carry the same number of ton-miles of freight. This will damage the economy and raise prices for everyone.

And there is no evidence that electronically limiting truck speeds improves safety. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Association reported that about 80 percent of the fatal crashes with large trucks occurred in areas with speed limits no higher than 65 mph, and nearly 60 percent occurred in regions that have speed limits of 55 mph or lower.  Speed often is not the critical issue for fatal crashes with heavy trucks or any other vehicles, regardless of the posted limit. Speed as the principal cause for crashes almost never measures more than 6 percent or 7 percent of the total in unbiased research, and sometimes as low as 2 percent

A smooth and natural traffic flow is far more important than the absolute speeds, and truck speed limiters create a hurdle to achieving an optimum traffic flow.  Having trucks proceed at speeds closer to the light-duty vehicles is more important for safety.  And drivers with even a moderate amount of experience also know that sometimes the correct action to avoid a crash or another hazard is to temporarily accelerate. Speed limiters will take away this sometimes critical safety choice from truck drivers.

In reality, the speed limiter proposal was requested primarily by some large trucking firms to reduce some of the competitive advantages independent truckers and small firms often have over large carriers.

Independents and small firms already have a better safety record than large carriers, so safety was not the reason for the proposal from the large trucking firms. It would be totally wrong for the NHTSA and the FMCSA to adopt a rule to financially favor the large trucking firms at the expense of the more efficient independents that are also safer overall.

The federal proposal to require truck speed limiters should be rejected.

Editor’s note: James C. Walker is executive director of the nonprofit National Motorists Association Foundation. He testifies frequently before state legislative committees on proposed legislation that affects traffic safety and other motorists issues.

Related: Why Lower Speed Limits and Truck Speed Limiters Will Save Lives

6 Responses

  1. stephen webster

    Cruise set at 63 mile per hour is a good idea and allow to go up to 70 mile per hour on the foot. Set driver pay at a flat $18.00 per hour based on a cruise set a 60 mile per hour do NOT pay driver for extra miles for speed over 60 mile per hour.Truck drivers should have the option to go faster for short periods of time but must not be paid extra to do so.

  2. Sergey K

    Well, the speed limitation is a good idea, but the truckers must have an opportunity to move a bit faster for a short period of time. Sure the rates for the loads must increase a bit to compensate additional time spent in the truck. And BTW the backhaul finding services must work smarter. All these Apps like Convoy or Doft.com, so called Uber for trucking, must offer the truck driver a backhaul as close as possible to their destination point.

  3. Chris

    I have driven restricted trucks in Europe for 10 years. 56mph is the standard limit set and it has made things safer. The biggest issue is non restricted trucks coming in from outside the EU and they cause so many accidents by speeding.

    • Rich

      You must be great trucker talent and true European patriot. Old professionals know that speed limiters are dangerous. it is not about to run truck faster or over speed limit, nor to make extra miles and $, it is about keeping rig momentum in critical scenarios.

  4. Dominique Boyriven

    I live in Africa and in the country where we are, speed governors will because of their concept damage the injection system on trucks, buses or what have you but more important, the ones we see here will in fact completely shut off the engine when the device is triggered 3 times. Now imagine a driver just topping a hill and going slowly on the down side, he retrogrades misses his gears , triggers the system 3 times and with a total engine shutdown loses all controls. Why not have recorders like in Europe. The TIR trucks use these disks recording devices that will tell upon verification by any traffic police unit the discrepancies in the drivers travels. Excessive speeds are recorded, non respect of stopping times are recorded, the journey’s actual kilometers are recorded. There is no tempering possibility. The vehicle keeps all its power if needed but a good conscientious driver would knowing the penalties for infractions respect the rules because that is his bread earning job. No more license equals to no more job!

  5. Market Based

    Calling this hack an “industry thought leader” is like calling a 9/11 truther a demolitions expert.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.


Subscribe to our mailing lists

Choose one or more topics: