Congress Should Not Interfere With Mail Truck Purchases

July 19, 2021 by Trucks.com, @trucksdotcom

Editor’s note: Written by Paul Steidler, a Senior Fellow with the Lexington Institute, a public policy think tank based in Arlington, Va. This is one in a series of periodic guest columns by industry thought leaders.

The U.S. Postal Service is in dire need of a clean, modern, and customized mail truck fleet and after rigorous and careful study has a sensible plan to get there. But Congress could mess this up and create additional problems by demanding an all-electric, non-emitting fleet as soon as possible while also imposing huge mandates on USPS which will needlessly cost the American people billions.

In a May 11 letter to President Biden, more than 50 lawmakers said, “There has never been a more critical time to ensure that all federal vehicles produce zero emissions, including the over 228,000 delivery vehicles operated by the Postal Service.”

Left unchecked, the practical consequences of such strident demands and accompanying legislation will be USPS having an even dirtier fleet in three years than it does today, longer delivery times for the American people, and tougher operating conditions for postal workers.

First, the good news. On February 23, following nearly six years of study, USPS announced it awarded a contract to Oshkosh Defense to provide 50,000-165,000 Next Generation Delivery Vehicles (NGDV) over the next 10 years to deliver mail and packages.

Today, almost 70 percent of USPS’s more than 200,000 delivery and collection vehicles are between 25 and 32 years old. They were designed to last 24 years.

The current vehicles are antiquated with many lacking air conditioning and modern braking systems. While many delivery vehicles are driven less than 20 miles a day, they are expensive to operate. USPS’s Office of Inspector General found that the “average maintenance costs per vehicle were about $5,000” in 2018, costs which are likely even higher today. Ten thousand vehicles had more than $12,000 in average annual maintenance costs, or more than $120 million annually.

As Trucks.com has thoroughly documented, many USPS vehicles catch on fire. This creates life-threatening situations, and it is fortunate that a postal worker has not already been killed in such incidents. The burning rubber and other metal components create significant environmental havoc.

The new vehicles mean safer and more comfortable trucks for postal workers, more reliable vehicles to better deliver mail and packages, and significantly more environmentally friendly trucks, even if they were to all have modern-day internal combustion engines, which they will not.

Because of politics, though, any announcement that Postmaster General Louis DeJoy made about the new vehicles was likely face criticism. DeJoy, a megadonor who raised money for President Trump and the Republican Party, has drawn the ire of many Congressional Democrats since becoming postmaster general in June 2020.

USPS’s February 23 announcement had an important and often-overlooked statement that should have been welcome news to all, “The vehicles will be equipped with either fuel-efficient internal combustion engines or battery-electric powertrains and can be retrofitted to keep pace with advances in electric vehicle technologies.” Oshkosh Defense is ready to build the vehicles with internal combustible engines or battery-electric powertrains.

In Congressional testimony on February 24 and later, DeJoy has jousted with Democrats demanding more electric vehicles, effectively telling them that more Congressional funds would mean more electric vehicle purchases. This request was made even though Congress gave USPS $10 billion in the December COVID package and USPS already has approximately $26 billion in cash.

The Democrats’ legislation, the Postal Vehicle Modernization Act, introduced by Congressman Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), has plenty of strings attached to the $6 billion. It calls for “each postal service accessible to the public” to have at least “one electric vehicle charging station for use by the public” no later than January 1, 2026.

It also requires that at least half of the medium and heavy-duty trucks purchased by USPS by 2029 be electric or zero-emission vehicles. USPS has approximately 30,000 such vehicles currently.

There are three fundamental reasons why Congressional meddling in the USPS trucks purchase decision will have negative ramifications.

Financially Irresponsible. The 10-year planned procurement will cost an estimated $6 billion that USPS is poised to pay. Under the Huffman proposal, Congress would provide $6 billion to USPS free and clear immediately, for USPS to hold and spend going forward. This is to prevent a Republican-controlled Congress from canceling the program.

But the hidden costs for charging stations, the higher costs for medium and heavy-duty trucks, and the uncertainties associated with large-scale deployment of electric vehicles are substantial.

Threatens to delay the deployment of cleaner trucks. There are often unintended consequences from major legislation. The Postal Service should not in any way be hampered from obtaining as many trucks as quickly as possible. It is critical that the ongoing work to finalize the production design, plant tooling and build out of the U.S. manufacturing facility proceed expeditiously to meet the 2023 target for new delivery vehicles being delivered.

Legislation will lead to wholesale political interference in USPS. The U.S. Postal Service is entirely part of the federal government. Under The Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, however, USPS’s operations have since then been largely protected from political interference. This is because USPS can charge for its services to cover its costs.

If Congress sets the precedent for managing USPS’s fleet it could soon be interfering in pricing and deliveries, returning postal operations to an era of cronyism and inefficiency. Congress, for example, could also expand its micromanagement of 30,000 postal facilities by determining how they should be retrofitted to be more environmentally friendly.

If Congress believes it is in the national interest for USPS to have an all-electric or largely electric delivery fleet, it can pass a resolution expressing this and calling upon USPS to fund the project by asking more from its customers. The users of postal services should pay for postal vehicles.

There is no reason to make the process more complicated than this. And given USPS’s large cash balance, it already has the resources to make such purchases without being saddled with new mandates and Congressional requirements.

Trucks.com welcomes divergent thoughts and opinions on transport technology and trucking industry issues. Use the comments section to cite yours. Qualified opinion leaders are welcome to offer suggestions for opinion columns. Contact info@trucks.com.

Jerry Hirsch June 29, 2021
Electric truck builder Workhorse Group called the U.S. Postal Service’s decision to award a giant contract for the next mail truck to a rival “arbitrary, capricious, and without rational basis” in a legal filing.

4 Responses

  1. Julian R Mallett

    Here is where this article is wrong.
    1. Financially Irresponsible.
    Actually electric vehicles are cheaper in this stop-go service and have a much lower Total Cost of Ownership. The ICE proposal is more expensive and the proposed $6b is not needed.

    2. Threatens to delay the deployment of cleaner trucks.
    Because the awardee did not build prototypes of their trucks in their bait and switch scheme the time required to design and build prototypes is longer than an already designed EV. The choice of vehicle delays the introduction of new vehicles by nearly a year.

    3. Legislation will lead to wholesale political interference in USPS.
    There is public documentation showing that there was political influence at the highest levels that the USPS themselves stated requires disqualification of the award. An investigation into political influence, mysterious stock trades the evening before the award and the contradiction with all other delivery company economics is definitely worth investigation at the congressional oversight level. There should be no reason why the decision making process should be kept secret.

    Reply
  2. Eugene

    Pretty sure you guys are on the Oshkosh payroll. Having an entire fleet by Workhorse would save the agency billions of dollars in fuel costs.

    Reply
  3. Andrew

    The “often overlooked” claim that the Oshkosh computer-generated NGDV rendering can be “retrofitted” someday in the future TBD…has never been prototyped, demonstrated, priced-out or quoted to taxpayers. In fact, it’s likely another fantasy concept…solely to get past Congress. The weight, size and complexity of ICE platforms are inconsistent with those of pure-electric designs.

    Reply
  4. L kimura

    Never mind Congress, how about the USPS follow it’s own procurement rules when picking its next mail delivery van? Why have a two year competitive fly-off between prototypes from five different suppliers and award the contract to a company for a vehicle that was never tested?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

×

Subscribe to our mailing lists

Choose one or more topics:
x